Croydon Council may have to confront stopping to support new unaccompanied asylum-seeking children and young people, its Leader has warned.
The cash-strapped local authority has written to ministers calling on the Government to fund properly a £2.3m funding gap in the cost of looking after UASC, saying that the shortfall poses a safeguarding risk to children’s services in its area.
The call to ministers has been backed by the borough’s government-appointed Improvement and Assurance Panel.
The letter to the Secretaries of State for the Home Office, Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government and the Department for Education requests a meeting, and seeks to underline the strength of the borough’s case for urgent financial support.
Croydon has also called for the government to make it mandatory for all councils to share responsibility for new arrivals.
All UASC asylum in the UK must register at the Home Office unit in Croydon town centre. “In the past decade Croydon has looked after more than 5,000 of these vulnerable children, but central government has not repaid most of the costs as expected,” the council claimed.
The council said that it was still to hear from the Home Office, Department for Education and the MHCLG.
Recommendations to a meeting of Croydon’s Cabinet this week (16 August) included asking government to reduce Croydon’s unaccompanied asylum-seeking rate to 0.07% of all local children. Applying this national threshold would mean Croydon had 66 children – instead it has 156, plus 477 older care leavers who had arrived unaccompanied.
There is also a recommendation that officers draw up all available options that limit the council’s exposure to financial risk. The Cabinet meeting comes weeks before a three-month period comes to an end where 24 other London councils have voluntarily taken new arrivals to help Croydon.
Cllr Alisa Flemming, cabinet member for children, young people and learning, said: “We want to be able to continue to play our part and help support unaccompanied asylum-seeking children and young people, but it is now crucial that the Home Office address the historic funding pressures that they have repeatedly fallen short on meeting.
“We cannot continue to carry such an unreasonable and unsustainable financial burden – the forecast budget gap for the council’s care of unaccompanied children and young people sits at £2.357m in this financial year, rising to a £7.149m funding gap over the period of the council’s Medium Term Financial Strategy. If the current number of children we are providing care for rises further then this will pile greater pressure on our finances. This pressure is unsustainable and could pose a serious safeguarding risk to the care we are able to provide for children. I urge the Home Office to hear and act positively to address these very real and serious concerns.”
Cllr Hamida Ali, leader of Croydon Council, said: “Despite months of constructive discussions with government, there is still no word from government on providing the financial support everyone has agreed must be found and the situation has now become urgent.
“Croydon has the highest proportion of unaccompanied asylum-seeking children and young people of any council in the country. We are proud of our record in welcoming and caring for such vulnerable young people but it simply isn’t reasonable to expect the council to continue to do this alone.”
Cllr Ali added: “Government has agreed that we are providing crucial support which is currently unfunded – but that consensus isn’t enough. With every month that passes, this council shoulders both growing financial risk and potential risk to the safety of our support to all our young people.
“We won’t jeopardise our frontline children’s services or our improving financial performance but we need a positive response from ministers now. Without it we have no choice but to keep all options on the table, including having to confront stopping to support new unaccompanied asylum-seeking children and young people.
“In the longer term, the government must review its approach to the new National Transfer Scheme and make it mandatory. The fairest and most sustainable way forward is for all local authorities to share this important duty to some of the world’s most vulnerable children. Experience has already shown us that a voluntary system just doesn’t work.”
In June the Home Office and the Department for Education unveiled changes to the National Transfer Scheme that they claimed would ensure responsibility for UASC would be more fairly distributed.
However, Kent County Council, which claims to have borne the brunt of a surge in UASC, said that the proposals were not enough for it to withdraw its threat of legal action.
The local authority had also announced that for the second time it had reached an unsafe capacity and would no longer be able to accept any further new UASC arrivals from 14 June.